Wine Tech Update 06
About a year and a half ago I reported on the then new and growing practice of using barrel alternatives. Putting the oak in the wine, instead of the other way around. There was a perceived stigma to using this technique over more traditional (and vastly more expensive) oak barrels. Back then I had a hard time finding anyone that would admit to even experimenting with barrel alternatives.
Now "everybody" is at least looking at how they can be using oak chips, staves and the myriad other shapes and grinds that oak is available in. When used appropriately, in lesser priced wines, and in conjunction with micro-oxygenation, I am a fan of the concept.
Wine was made more or less the same way for thousands of years. There was a gradual change starting with corked bottles about 200 years ago. The tempo of innovation picked up after Pasteur and the twin wine plagues of the late 19th century. The last half of the 20th century saw advances in winemaking such as stainless steel tanks and computerized controls.
But the last 5 years or so have been a rush of modernization. Bottles now come with screw tops that are better than corks, and some decent wines are now "boxed" instead of bottled. But this is nothing compared to what is just over the horizon.
Less than 200 years ago the mechanism of making wine was shrouded in mystery. Microbiology was not yet a science, and hygiene was wishful thinking. Pasteur changed all that, but superstition and tradition kept microbiology from playing a bigger part in making wine.
Natural yeast was the buzz word a few decades ago. Wine makers often eschewed the addition of yeast, preferring to trust the yeast that tends to grow on the grapes. More than one writer, more expert than I, pointed out that the wine was probably being effected more by yeast in the winery, than by the yeast found on the grapes. In some cases at least, the natural yeast crowd were fooling themselves.
Control is the aim of a larger winery, and the smaller wineries are starting to learn why. The element of chance may yield an occasional great wine, but it is a better business model to shoot for consistency. Controlling the yeast you use is one way to assure a more reliable product.
The choices in yeast have come a long way in the last few years. There were always strains that were more resistant to this or that, or better suited to one application than another, but there is much more to pick from now. Yeast that accentuate one aspect of a wine over another are in the works, and some have already come to market.
You can even use specialized yeast to control some of the undesirable side products of fermentation (such as histamines which occur in all fermented products, but are problematic for asthmatics). This is cutting edge and research has only begun, but the potential is astounding.
Yeast aren't the only micro organisms in a winery, and most of the others are much less desirable. Harsh, and even toxic cleaning solutions have been used to ensure sterility with reasonable success, but ultraviolet light promises to do away with many of those nasty chemicals.
Technology can do more for the wine industry than just make all the wines taste the same (the great fear of technophobes). It can assure healthier, more consistent wines with more complexity and character, all at a more reasonable cost. Today we can dial in the amount of oak, accentuate specific character and even reduce the side effects of wine. What will tomorrow bring?
One thing is sure, I will continue to glance just ahead of the curve, and bring you timely updates.
Now "everybody" is at least looking at how they can be using oak chips, staves and the myriad other shapes and grinds that oak is available in. When used appropriately, in lesser priced wines, and in conjunction with micro-oxygenation, I am a fan of the concept.
Wine was made more or less the same way for thousands of years. There was a gradual change starting with corked bottles about 200 years ago. The tempo of innovation picked up after Pasteur and the twin wine plagues of the late 19th century. The last half of the 20th century saw advances in winemaking such as stainless steel tanks and computerized controls.
But the last 5 years or so have been a rush of modernization. Bottles now come with screw tops that are better than corks, and some decent wines are now "boxed" instead of bottled. But this is nothing compared to what is just over the horizon.
Less than 200 years ago the mechanism of making wine was shrouded in mystery. Microbiology was not yet a science, and hygiene was wishful thinking. Pasteur changed all that, but superstition and tradition kept microbiology from playing a bigger part in making wine.
Natural yeast was the buzz word a few decades ago. Wine makers often eschewed the addition of yeast, preferring to trust the yeast that tends to grow on the grapes. More than one writer, more expert than I, pointed out that the wine was probably being effected more by yeast in the winery, than by the yeast found on the grapes. In some cases at least, the natural yeast crowd were fooling themselves.
Control is the aim of a larger winery, and the smaller wineries are starting to learn why. The element of chance may yield an occasional great wine, but it is a better business model to shoot for consistency. Controlling the yeast you use is one way to assure a more reliable product.
The choices in yeast have come a long way in the last few years. There were always strains that were more resistant to this or that, or better suited to one application than another, but there is much more to pick from now. Yeast that accentuate one aspect of a wine over another are in the works, and some have already come to market.
You can even use specialized yeast to control some of the undesirable side products of fermentation (such as histamines which occur in all fermented products, but are problematic for asthmatics). This is cutting edge and research has only begun, but the potential is astounding.
Yeast aren't the only micro organisms in a winery, and most of the others are much less desirable. Harsh, and even toxic cleaning solutions have been used to ensure sterility with reasonable success, but ultraviolet light promises to do away with many of those nasty chemicals.
Technology can do more for the wine industry than just make all the wines taste the same (the great fear of technophobes). It can assure healthier, more consistent wines with more complexity and character, all at a more reasonable cost. Today we can dial in the amount of oak, accentuate specific character and even reduce the side effects of wine. What will tomorrow bring?
One thing is sure, I will continue to glance just ahead of the curve, and bring you timely updates.

